The case where the bulb goes on and off may be such an example where different parties could not give the reason for the unpredictability. Determinism fails to be specific and will state anything as being the cause. In most cases, however, determinism fails at large to mention the kind of causes that must have led to a particular occurrence. Scientists would state the cause of death as diseases and other biological factors while Christians will say it is the will of God. The argument about death is such an example that brings forth the involvement of the scientists and religion. The science world and the world of religion seem to have created their own platforms that they both base on in determining the cause of everything. A leaf falling off from a tree must have been driven by the law of gravity.Īn earthquake happening in some regions of the world must have been brought by the centripetal and centrifugal forces. Laws in physics put in place some situations that will determine a particular phenomenon. Determinism receives immense support from laws. In the contemporary society, a person stealing will be termed as a thief because the action itself is against the relevant law. It is true that since ancient times, people believed in causes. Furthermore, mechanistic determinism will state that every event taking place must have been influenced by other conditions (Hocking, 2010). On the other hand, scientists may have the same dimensional thinking stating that everything that happens is as a result of prior causes existing in the natural world. In this case, God is the source of every outcome (Hospers, 1997). Theological determinism will state the fact that everything happens through the will of God.
Religious people are of the belief that anything good must be influenced by particular external forces. The question that one needs to ask himself or herself is whether everything that happens has a cause? In some situations, the answer is yes. The principle leans towards the aspect of every occurrence being aligned with a particular cause. Discussionĭeterminism favors the causal principle. They should be able to choose who they want to be, what they want to do and become the person of their own choice in life. People need to have the freedom to decide their course of life. Situations may sometimes be too tight, and this may call for an action that may be termed as philosophically sound or not sound. The four conditions put any person in a big dilemma especially with regard to determining the course of action or self-identity. There may be constraints, but limits do not form any barrier.
#Sometimes the hand of fate must be forced free#
However, free will is the central ability to make a choice between separate courses of action. In many circumstances, people ask more about free will than fate. On the other hand, fate is simply the predetermined course of the events or the predetermined future. In real life situation, determinism is commonly referred to as cause and effect (Hospers, 1997). From the normal definition, it is evident that determinism is simply the philosophical position assigned for every event such that there are conditions or factors that could not cause any other event. In this context, however, the focus narrows down to following argumentative terms in philosophy, which include fate, determinism, ontology and free will. It is a study involving general as well as fundamental problems like the ones closely associated with knowledge, mind as well as a language among many other aspects. Philosophy is a very wide field dealing with human thinking and reasoning capabilities thereby providing the ultimate platform for making decisions and solving problems.
0 kommentar(er)
